Services / Advisory
Give emissions-reduction decisions a business case.
Compare reduction opportunities using emissions, capital, operating effects, feasibility, timing, and risk.
When this helps
A target has been announced, but the delivery plan is unclear. Efficiency, fleet, energy, and supplier initiatives compete for limited capital.
The decision this supports
Decide which initiatives to investigate, fund, sequence, or defer—and what assumptions could change that decision.
What you receive
- Baseline and target-boundary assessment with explicit assumptions and dependencies.
- Prioritized initiative portfolio and emissions-reduction roadmap.
- Business cases showing capital requirements, operating effects, payback, and appropriate discounted cash-flow measures.
- Financing-options assessment where relevant, plus owners, milestones, and progress measures.
How we work
Confirm the baseline and decision criteria; develop a comparable set of initiatives; assess emissions and cash-flow implications; test sensitivities; and sequence implementation with operations and finance.
Methods that fit the decision
Target design considers the relevant accounting boundary, baseline, sector pathway, and current target-setting guidance. Finance work assesses mechanisms and funding structures for the specific business case; it does not promise eligibility or funding.
Scope and boundaries
Net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) are used where appropriate, with agreed assumptions. Engineering design, tax opinions, investment advice, financing placement, and guaranteed savings are excluded. Target validation, if sought, remains with the relevant external body.
Who should be involved
Finance and capital allocation leaders, operations, engineering, procurement, treasury, strategy, and sustainability.
Turn a target into a practical plan.
Bring the initiatives, constraints, and capital decisions you need to compare.